Legislative intelligence you can check in a minute.

A model can produce a section number as fluently as a sentence, and the two look identical on the page. Unless the provision at that address was fetched and the duty's own words found in it, the citation is a claim about the law, not a reading of it.

Acts about schools mostly bind ministers, regulators and systems. A corpus that cannot say which side a duty falls on frightens a principal with obligations that were never theirs, and a school that discovers one such error stops trusting the rest.

A penalty the statute does not express in dollars is either dropped to zero or inflated to a maximum, and either way a dollar total then reads as the whole picture. It is not, and a procurement reviewer who works that out unaided concludes the number was built to mislead.

Each in-scope duty was tagged to a domain by two independent passes, and the agreement between them is scored. The mass sits at 0.8 and above; the 386 rows below it were routed to a person rather than resolved by taking the higher score. It does not prove a tag is right. Two passes agreeing is evidence, not proof, which is precisely why the contested rows were adjudicated by a human.

The provision at each row's address was fetched from the store, the duty's own words were found in it at a fixed threshold, and the instrument's identity was confirmed separately by citation. The climb runs from the field's first deterministic reading on 31 August through a tokeniser correction, a repair pass over 559 anchors, a calibrated section-field tie-break, re-derived pins, recovered stem windows and three gated restatement rounds. It does not treat unverified as clean. Verified, failed and unverified are three states, and every row that is not verified is named with its class and its reason in the corpus verification record.

All 9,670 in-scope duties carry one of eight severity bands, with the statutory text quoted on the row. Two of the eight are honesty devices rather than rungs: an offence whose maximum the statute does not state in dollars, and a nil consequence assigned only under a human ruling with the supporting authority quoted. It does not rank duties by importance. The band prices the stated consequence of breach; a duty with no consequence can still be the one a school must not skip.

Every claim about the law traces to a stored retrieval from the legal store. Severity bands quote the penalty sentence they were read from; where a regulator's power is the consequence, the power is quoted. Where we assert a duty does not exist, the assertion cites the express statutory carve-out, because an absence claim is only as good as its last chase.

Every row is verified, failed or unverified, never silently assumed fine. A duty whose penalty cannot be stated in dollars says so on its face, placed beside the most serious band so an unknown can never read as small. A plain-language reading that fails a gate is withheld with its evidence, not published with a caveat.

Where the law does not settle a question, the call was made by a named person, numbered, dated and recorded with what it changed. The log corrects itself in new entries rather than by editing old ones, so it shows what was known when.

Sixty-nine named quality passes across twelve frozen cuts: dual-blind tagging, tie-break passes, five adversarial lanes, hostile framework review, profile walks with constructed schools, a line-by-line corroboration of the partnership whitepaper against the live data, and a verification programme that made correctness a property of every row. Defects found in the upstream store were referred back with reproduction evidence rather than worked around silently.

An overstated claim of national parity, a published coverage finding that proved 64.8 per cent false positive, an absence corroborated three ways and still wrong: each is preserved beside its correction. A record that admits its errors is the strongest evidence that the numbers which survived are real.

Every candidate instrument was adjudicated keep or kill with a coded reason, and 206 of the 327 kept instruments were found by hunting rather than handed over. Nobody publishes the list of Australian instruments that bind a school. We built one, and because every exclusion carries its reason, a sceptic can argue with the boundary instead of guessing at it. A firm's boundary is the scope of the retainer, and it is not written down anywhere the client can inspect.

A duty is not a sentence about the law; it is a pointer to a versioned provision in a store of 801,178 primary-source documents, which can be fetched and compared on demand. Nothing rests on recall, and nothing rests on our good name. A claim that cannot be checked is worth less than one that can be, even when both are true, because only one of them survives an argument.

Sixty-nine named quality passes, five hostile review lanes, dual-blind subject tagging with the disagreements escalated to people, and a verification programme that turned correctness into a property of every row rather than a claim about the whole. When our own review found a national work-health-and-safety extraction gap behind a confident claim of parity, it was closed inside the day and the overstatement left in the record beside its correction. An opinion that has never been attacked is not a stronger opinion. It is an untested one.